Standards Gap Statement Analysis
Thirty-two (32) Standards gap statements were identified, which represent 13% of the total number of gap statements. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) issues and interoperable EV charging standards represent the most significant sub-gap areas in this category. In general, respondents that discuss standards are almost uniformly frustrated with the slow adoption of a national standard in the US for EV charging. The main takeaway from the standards gap statements is that key players seek assistance in expediting the process to reach a uniform set of technology protocols for the NA EVSE supply chain.